I was recently told that, because I'm male, I can't be a feminist. I can only be an “ally” of the women who are true feminists.
This kind of mischaracterization of
feminism as a women-only issue makes me worry that there isn't a
future in which the supposed goal of feminism – complete gender
equality – can ever be realized. Can't you see the contradiction in
calling yourself a feminist when you draw gender lines regarding
feminism itself?
Stop and think about it. How often do
you, a feminist, discriminate based on gender?
Do you participate in a “ladies
night” or “girl's night out?” You're not a feminist.
Finding a unisex changing room at a
boutique, would you decide you didn't really
need to try your outfit on? You're not a feminist.
I know what some of you are thinking.
You like your ladies' nights.
You like the privacy
of the ladies' changing room. And I don't blame you. But if you want
to be a part of the exclusive man-clubs, you have to stop insisting
on your right to exclusive woman-clubs. There is no
separate-but-equal segregation in feminism.
Are you fine with your son/daughter
being alone with same-sex friends, but keep a close eye when other
genders are around? You're not a feminist.
Do you let your sons date whomever they
will, but vet your daughters' boyfriends like a private eye? You're
not a feminist.
It's important to protect your
children. But using gender as a basis for when to be protective is
ludicrous. Leaving any children completely unsupervised can result in
a bad situation, regardless of their age or sex. When you treat children of
one gender one way and the other another, especially relating to sex
and sexuality, you enforce gender biases. Gender biases are not
feminist.
Would you get your daughter's ears
pierced, but balk at doing the same for your sons? You're not a
feminist.
Sure, you nod approvingly when the
Relief Society president wears a pantsuit, but would you be appalled
if your bishop wore a dress? You're not a feminist.
Gender equality means the road goes
both ways. Sure, women should be the equals of men, but men must then
also be the equals of women. What is okay for one sex has
to be okay for the other, even when it comes to jewelry and clothing.
Anything else wouldn't be equality, but simply an illusion
of equality.
So what would a feminist world look
like? What would it be like to have true gender equality?
Since I'm writing from an LDS
perspective, let's look at a gender-equal LDS church.
First, let's say goodbye to YM/YW,
goodbye to RS/Priesthood meetings. The two-hour meeting block has
become a reality: only Sacrament Meeting and Sunday School. Once a
month, the Priesthood offices (male and female) meet together during
Sunday School to discuss specific topics related to their office.
Monthly adult activities are all overseen by the Ward Activity
Committee, and the youth are encouraged to look after the children
while the parents attend the activity.
The “Mother's Rooms” are removed
from the ladies' toilets (which are no longer gendered anyway) and
replaced with spacious rooms, with speakers that broadcast during
both Sacrament Meeting and Sunday School, that accommodate parents of
both sexes who are trying to care for fussy babies and young
children. Women who want to breastfeed in the “Parent's Room” do
so covered or uncovered as they choose. But the diaper-changing
stations are in the toiletry next door.
Meanwhile, on the stand, the bishops are encouraged to call both male and female counselors. The stake council is roughly split between brethren and sisters. And just last conference, the first female apostle was called to be a member of the First Presidency. From the mundane to the lofty, feminism has restructured the church and the world.
Maybe I'm just crazy to think that real equality is what modern feminists really want. Is this dream I have of a truly gender-equal church and society actually achievable within our lifetime? Probably not. But should you be working toward it? Yes. If
you're a feminist, like I am.
Disclaimer: It was brought to this author's attention that this blog post might be taken too seriously, and that the examples noted may be taken to be the author's views on the most important issues surrounding feminism. Please know that this is a satirical piece, written as a response to several recent blog posts about the "problems" with LDS men who consider themselves feminists, to point out that even the feminists who wrote those blogs don't really espouse 100% gender equality. Just think about what you really believe and what you stand for, and know that there are many of both sexes who stand with you.
Disclaimer: It was brought to this author's attention that this blog post might be taken too seriously, and that the examples noted may be taken to be the author's views on the most important issues surrounding feminism. Please know that this is a satirical piece, written as a response to several recent blog posts about the "problems" with LDS men who consider themselves feminists, to point out that even the feminists who wrote those blogs don't really espouse 100% gender equality. Just think about what you really believe and what you stand for, and know that there are many of both sexes who stand with you.